There is abundant evidence that the 2012 Election was marred by voting irregularities and fraud— and the election results did not match historically accurate Rasmussen or Gallup polling data. News stories from swing states were particularly disturbing– for example, there was “99% turnout” in 13 Philadelphia precincts.
But now, there is a news story that really tops the cake: “Democrat Melowese Richardson has been an official poll worker for the last quarter century and registered thousands of people to vote last year. She candidly admitted to Cincinnati’s Channel 9 this week that she voted twice in the last election.” Let’s consider the implications: a poll worker in swing-state Ohio has ADMITTED that she voted twice for Obama in the 2012 Election– by casting an absentee ballot and then voting again at the polls. Now, regarding this same Ohio poll worker, “Authorities also are investigating if she voted in the names of four other people, too, for a total of six votes in the 2012 presidential election.”
This is apparently a map of election returns for each county in America, and yet we got an Obama re-election…Yes, the blue areas are high population centers, but there is still something really weird going on. At the very least– even without the fraud that indisputably occurred in this election– we know that Obama doesn’t have a mandate, and we aren’t living in a “new America.”
Democrats can’t claim to have a mandate– even with the presence of Democrats’ voter intimidation and voter fraud in this election, the results show that Republican values are spread more widely across America than Democrats’. More counties’ majority returns were Republican, and massive population centers in blue states don’t define the country as a whole. Los Angeles, San Francisco, and other big cities offer “safe harbor” for illegal immigrants and don’t require voter IDs during elections. Moreover, big cities are historically more liberal and America’s character isn’t defined by these few locales.
Singer-songwriter Bob Dylan predicted that Obama would win in a “landslide.” Meanwhile, political polling experts including Frank Luntz predicted a close race in which Romney would narrowly win. Political expert Peggy Noonan’s analysis led her to believe that Obama was “fighting for his political life.” Former Clinton advisor and political commentator Dick Morris predicted a major Romney win.
I guess we should ask singer-songwriters for future election predictions. But then again, maybe a lightweight like Bob Dylan is only useful when he’s predicting Democratic wins against a backdrop of voter fraud and illegal electioneering.
Updated: Early voting for the Democrats was down. Election Day voting has always favored the GOP. Yet *somehow*, Mitt Romney received less votes than John McCain did in 2008 and less votes than John Kerry did in 2004. In the midst of 23 million unemployed, more than $16 trillion debt, 47 million Americans on Food Stamps, and other obvious economic woes felt by Americans across-the-board which can’t be covered up by the mainstream liberal media… we’re supposed to believe that Romney received less votes than McCain and less votes than Kerry? When the Tea Party is fired up, Republicans are impassioned, and conservative Americans increased their campaign efforts in battleground states to an unprecedented level (knocking on 19 times more doors in Ohio than McCain campaigners did 4 years ago)? SOMETHING DOESN’T ADD UP. The election results don’t match the historically accurate Rasmussen or Gallup polling data. Enthusiasm for Obama is way down, and Republicans rallied around Romney after highly-successful presidential debates. Maybe it’s news stories like this that lead to understanding: In 13 Philadelphia precincts, Obama received 99% of the vote– yet, voter turnout in Philadelphia was only 60%.
Today is Election Day in the United States of America. Election materials and electioneering inside the polling place are prohibited by state law, but that hasn’t stopped Obama campaigners from setting up a Philadelphia polling place next to a mural, positioned behind the voting machines, containing the words “change!” and “hope,” along with a quote from Obama and a painting of Obama. Even after a judge ordered the Philadelphia poll workers to cover up the Obama mural, they left “the Obama campaign logo and a quote from the current president in full view for voters.” Ironically, the Democratic Party has zero respect for the democratic process.
Obama’s campaign is up to the same exact sleaze tactics in Florida, where a polling station has a poster of Obama that says “Change the Atmosphere.”
If the Democratic Party actually cared about democracy and freedom, it would argue that these military voters should be able to vote via e-mail or fax the same way that voters in the mostly-Democratic precincts in Hurricane Sandy-hit states are being allowed to vote. The Democratic Party is committing rampant voter fraud in this election– it’s all over the news, out in the open. On Election Day, Romney will need to win by enough votes to overcome the “fraud” margin.
Registered Republicans in more than 20 counties in swing-state Florida have received hoax letters questioning their voter eligibility. The FBI is now investigating these fraudulent letters impersonating supervisors of elections: “Inside the letter is the resident’s supervisor of election’s name, the resident’s name and address, and a warning that doubts the voter’s citizenship, saying the resident is not eligible to vote unless a letter is returned in an enclosed form within 15 days.”
In a separate incident, swing-state Colorado voters say that ballots cast for Romney came up as votes for Obama on the voting machines. The same exact thing has happened in Ohio.
Update #2: “A government accountability group is accusing supervisors at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of urging the agency’s employees to vote for President Obama and other Democrats in November.”
Liberal groups sought the “Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe,” an affiliate of the United Nations, to intervene in United States elections by sending “election monitors” to our polling places. Ironically, the countries that will be sending these “election monitors” to United States polling places have been plagued by rampant allegations of election fraud themselves– among them, RUSSIA, UKRAINE, KAZAKHSTAN, AND SERBIA.