Tag Archives: Pennsylvania

Mitt Romney should not have conceded.

By Obamarageous on February 19, 2013 | Leave a comment

There is abundant evidence that the 2012 Election was marred by voting irregularities and fraud— and the election results did not match historically accurate Rasmussen or Gallup polling data. News stories from swing states were particularly disturbing– for example, there was “99% turnout” in 13 Philadelphia precincts.

But now, there is a news story that really tops the cake: “Democrat Melowese Richardson has been an official poll worker for the last quarter century and registered thousands of people to vote last year. She candidly admitted to Cincinnati’s Channel 9 this week that she voted twice in the last election.” Let’s consider the implications: a poll worker in swing-state Ohio has ADMITTED that she voted twice for Obama in the 2012 Election– by casting an absentee ballot and then voting again at the polls. Now, regarding this same Ohio poll worker, “Authorities also are investigating if she voted in the names of four other people, too, for a total of six votes in the 2012 presidential election.”

Posted in: 2012 Election, Civil Liberties, Corruption | Tagged: 2012 election, Cincinnati, Gallup, Melowese Richardson, obama, obama re-elected, obama re-election, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, poll worker, polling data, Rasmussen, romney, swing states, voter fraud, voter intimidation, voting irregularities

Prior evidence of fraud in the 2012 Election

By Obamarageous on November 7, 2012 | 2 Comments

Singer-songwriter Bob Dylan predicted that Obama would win in a “landslide.” Meanwhile, political polling experts including Frank Luntz predicted a close race in which Romney would narrowly win. Political expert Peggy Noonan’s analysis led her to believe that Obama was “fighting for his political life.” Former Clinton advisor and political commentator Dick Morris predicted a major Romney win.

I guess we should ask singer-songwriters for future election predictions. But then again, maybe a lightweight like Bob Dylan is only useful when he’s predicting Democratic wins against a backdrop of voter fraud and illegal electioneering.

Updated: Early voting for the Democrats was down. Election Day voting has always favored the GOP. Yet *somehow*, Mitt Romney received less votes than John McCain did in 2008 and less votes than John Kerry did in 2004. In the midst of 23 million unemployed, more than $16 trillion debt, 47 million Americans on Food Stamps, and other obvious economic woes felt by Americans across-the-board which can’t be covered up by the mainstream liberal media… we’re supposed to believe that Romney received less votes than McCain and less votes than Kerry? When the Tea Party is fired up, Republicans are impassioned, and conservative Americans increased their campaign efforts in battleground states to an unprecedented level (knocking on 19 times more doors in Ohio than McCain campaigners did 4 years ago)? SOMETHING DOESN’T ADD UP. The election results don’t match the historically accurate Rasmussen or Gallup polling data. Enthusiasm for Obama is way down, and Republicans rallied around Romney after highly-successful presidential debates. Maybe it’s news stories like this that lead to understanding: In 13 Philadelphia precincts, Obama received 99% of the vote– yet, voter turnout in Philadelphia was only 60%.