Secretary of State Hillary Clinton finally testified about the Obama Administration’s cover-up of the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya– and it was not a pretty sight:
There’s a good commentary from CainTV about Hillary Clinton’s meltdown on the witness stand: “Questioned by Ron Johnson over State Department inaction the night of the Benghazi attacks, Hillary Clinton had a bit of a meltdown during today’s testimony. Johnson asked why Hillary hadn’t done more to determine the validity of the administration’s infamous claim that the attacks sprung from a “spontaneous protest,” and pressed her on the fact that she was still repeating the lie days later. Hillary did her best to avoid the issue, and then started yelling. “The fact is; we had four dead Americans! Was it because of a protest? Or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they’d go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?” What difference does it make? It’s the difference between a government that fabricates events to cover-up its failings and a government that presents the truth of unpleasant facts. It’s the difference between a State Department that lies with impunity and one which is beholden to the people it serves. It’s the difference between an out-of-control bureaucracy and a government of the people. It’s the difference between reality and fiction.”
Hillary Clinton also attempted to halt Congress’ probing questions about the cover-up by feigning tears (probably setting back the potential for a female U.S. President by 50 years):
Singer-songwriter Bob Dylan predicted that Obama would win in a “landslide.” Meanwhile, political polling experts including Frank Luntz predicted a close race in which Romney would narrowly win. Political expert Peggy Noonan’s analysis led her to believe that Obama was “fighting for his political life.” Former Clinton advisor and political commentator Dick Morris predicted a major Romney win.
I guess we should ask singer-songwriters for future election predictions. But then again, maybe a lightweight like Bob Dylan is only useful when he’s predicting Democratic wins against a backdrop of voter fraud and illegal electioneering.
Updated: Early voting for the Democrats was down. Election Day voting has always favored the GOP. Yet *somehow*, Mitt Romney received less votes than John McCain did in 2008 and less votes than John Kerry did in 2004. In the midst of 23 million unemployed, more than $16 trillion debt, 47 million Americans on Food Stamps, and other obvious economic woes felt by Americans across-the-board which can’t be covered up by the mainstream liberal media… we’re supposed to believe that Romney received less votes than McCain and less votes than Kerry? When the Tea Party is fired up, Republicans are impassioned, and conservative Americans increased their campaign efforts in battleground states to an unprecedented level (knocking on 19 times more doors in Ohio than McCain campaigners did 4 years ago)? SOMETHING DOESN’T ADD UP. The election results don’t match the historically accurate Rasmussen or Gallup polling data. Enthusiasm for Obama is way down, and Republicans rallied around Romney after highly-successful presidential debates. Maybe it’s news stories like this that lead to understanding: In 13 Philadelphia precincts, Obama received 99% of the vote– yet, voter turnout in Philadelphia was only 60%.
Updated again: “While on the campaign trail for Obama in the battleground state of Virginia on Saturday, the vice-president gave a shout-out to Senate hopeful Tim Kaine but referred to the local candidate by the wrong name. ‘I’m a big Tom Kaine fan, a big Tom Kaine fan,’ Biden said enthusiastically.”
Updated for a third time: Biden accuses Romney of voting to give “a $500 trillion dollar tax-cut to 120,000 families.” Note that the gross domestic product (GDP) of the United States is approximately $15 trillion.
Updated for a fourth time: Biden refers to Obama as “President Clinton.”